Can Uniqlo Really Be Sustainable
Can a brand like Uniqlo be considered sustainable? In an era where fast fashion dominates, Uniqlo strives to distinguish itself, but how does it measure up?
Last month, Uniqlo announced the appointment of Clare Waight Keller as its new creative director, sparking a debate: Can a brand like Uniqlo be considered sustainable? In an era where fast fashion dominates, Uniqlo strives to distinguish itself, but how does it measure up?
Waight Keller, formerly of Givenchy, has transitioned from luxury couture to what she calls "the luxury of time." Her Uniqlo: C capsule collection—comprising a minimalist selection of trend-proof knits, suiting fabrics, and practical basics—reflects an ethos far removed from the excesses of the typical fashion cycle. Uniqlo's approach involves producing 125 new styles per season, far fewer than other fast-fashion giants, and carrying over half of the previous season's designs. Zara is estimated to create about 20,000 to 24,000 new styles annually, while H&M produces approximately 12,000 to 16,000 styles yearly. Retail expert Sarah Shapiro praises this, noting, "That's one way to do sustainability."
However, the conversation gets murkier when we consider Uniqlo's overall impact. While it emphasizes high-quality basics over the relentless churn of micro-trends, Uniqlo still produced an estimated 500 million garments last year. Only 8.5% of these garments were made from recycled or low greenhouse gas (GHG) materials—a long way from their 2030 target of 50%. Uniqlo also faces challenges in reducing its Scope 3 emissions, which measure the greenhouse gases emitted throughout its supply chain. The 20% reduction goal by 2030 feels insufficient when viewed against the broader context of global climate needs.
The company's efforts to become more sustainable are real but complicated. Waight Keller's designs may be a step towards a more mindful fashion philosophy. Still, Uniqlo's high-volume production model and the relatively modest environmental targets—remain barriers to fully embracing sustainability. It's a dichotomy that makes Uniqlo hard to categorize neatly: both striving for longevity in fashion and continuing practices that critics might call inherently unsustainable.
This leads to a larger question: Why are we fighting so hard about clothes? Why does the sustainability of a T-shirt or a pair of jeans spark so much debate, and why do we care? The answer lies in the complex relationship between fashion, identity, and the environment. Clothing isn't just fabric stitched together—it's a reflection of who we are, how we want to be seen, and increasingly, what we stand for. The fight over sustainability in fashion isn't just about clothes; it's about the kind of world we want to live in.
Fashion, after all, is one of the most polluting industries globally, and the choices brands make ripple outward. For Uniqlo, the challenge is navigating the space between mass production, which makes their garments accessible, and genuine sustainability—which requires more than just a well-marketed capsule collection. Waight Keller's vision of "the luxury of time" might signal a move towards thoughtful, long-lasting fashion, but can it coexist with the demands of a global brand producing millions of garments each year?
Uniqlo's strategy of limiting new styles per season and focusing on core, high-quality pieces is commendable. It shows an understanding of the need for less waste and more durable fashion. Yet, the sheer scale of their production and modest environmental goals begs the question: Is this enough? Are we simply settling for "less bad" instead of striving for truly good?
The fact that Uniqlo has only recently begun to report on its greenhouse gas emissions and that its environmental section takes up a mere fraction of its corporate reports suggests that sustainability still needs to be fully embedded in its ethos. It's not just about producing fewer styles or using better materials; it's about rethinking how clothes are made, sold, and disposed of. The fashion industry has long operated on a cycle of excess, and breaking that cycle requires a radical shift.
Waight Keller's move from Givenchy to Uniqlo is emblematic of this tension. It's a story of a designer who once crafted gowns for royalty now designing affordable basics for the masses. It's also a story about the shifting definitions of luxury—from exclusivity and opulence to time, quality, and sustainability. But as Waight Keller herself admits, the fashion industry is like a train you can never step off. The pressure to keep moving, to keep producing, is relentless.
So, can Uniqlo be considered sustainable? The answer isn't straightforward. There are hopeful signs—the slower fashion cycles, the focus on quality basics—but there are also significant hurdles. The fight over clothes is ultimately a fight over values: convenience versus conscience, affordability versus impact, the present versus the future. And until the industry as a whole, including giants like Uniqlo, truly commits to reimagining how fashion works, the question will remain unanswered.
The fight about clothes, it turns out, is really a fight about us,who we are, who we want to be, and the kind of planet we want to leave behind.
Vera
I really hope you're enjoying The Sustainability Pulse, my weekly newsletter looking at sustainability in the fashion industry. If you find the tips and insights useful, please share these articles to help spread the word.